Which car has the advantage?
1. Keyword: environmental balance
In Switzerland, transport accounts for one third of annual energy consumption. According to the Federal Roads Office FEDRO, 96% of CO2 emissions in transport are caused by fossil fuels consumed by commercial vehicles and passenger cars. Electric cars, on the other hand, do not emit CO2. So are they on the whole more environmentally friendly?
Advantages during the operating phase
When it comes to this question, opinions tend to differ sharply: It is undisputed that electric cars are less harmful to the climate during the operating phase. This is especially true if they are operated using green electricity. In any case, the electricity mix in Switzerland is relatively environmentally friendly. According to the Swiss Federal Office of Energy, 62% of electricity currently comes from renewable sources, the largest of which being hydropower. In addition, the efficiency of electric vehicles is massively higher than that of cars running on petrol or diesel.
Disadvantages regarding production and disposal
However, the production of car batteries is energy-intensive and often also pollutes the environment. For skeptics, this is a weighty counterargument. The comparisons of the Auto-Umweltliste (environmental automobile listing) therefore not only take account of the operating phase but also the environmental damage caused by the production of the electric batteries (https://eco-auto.info). The portal operated by the Swiss Association for Transport and Environment (VCS) concludes that the energy balance between the models can vary significantly. Nevertheless, electric cars usually occupy the top spots in their respective vehicle class. It is still unclear how environmentally damaging the disposal of car batteries will be. However, a fully functional battery can be given a second lease of life in many cases, for example as an aggregator for illuminating football pitches. It is therefore not yet possible to conclusively assess the environmental balance.
Conclusion: Since not enough information is available yet, it's still 0-0 for now. For manufacturers and customers, the environmental balance is the dominant topic. Great efforts are expected in terms of both drive forms in this regard to reduce the environmental impact of battery production and disposal.
2. Keyword: noise
Everybody knows that electric cars don't produce any exhaust fumes. It is also widely acknowledged that electric cars are quieter in urban traffic than conventional vehicles. They are even partly equipped with artificial sounds to warn other road users. In a world of electric mobility, people living on busy streets could sleep better, which would improve the quality of life in cities. However: Quiet vehicles also have a risk potential because many people rely on their ears in road traffic.
Conclusion: One point for electric cars: 1-0.
3. Keyword: flexibility
There are already more than 7,200 electric filling stations in Switzerland. New ones are constantly being added. Z Volt, the new charging app from Zurich, provides access to all charging stations in Switzerland and Europe. There is even a standard price without hidden costs at all the stations of our partners, Green Motion (evpass) and GOFAST. This offer applies to a total of about 2,300 charging stations in Switzerland. Charging with electricity does not take much longer than drinking an espresso at the fast charging stations. By contrast, gasoline-driven cars can rely on a gas station network that has proven its worth for decades. Consequently, this point goes to both drive forms: the score stands at 2-1.
4. Keyword: range
Getting from Zurich to Cologne, from Geneva to Paris, from Lugano to Florence with a full tank is normally not a problem with petrol or diesel-powered cars; they usually have ranges of 500 kilometers or more on long-distance routes. For electric cars, on the other hand, the term "range anxiety" was coined. How far you can get with an electric vehicle depends, among other things, on your driving style, the load in the car and the outside temperature. The ranges achieved in vehicle tests are often significantly lower than the values specified by the manufacturer under ideal conditions. These issues can have relatively little importance for those who mainly travel in city traffic. However, things are changing in terms of range. The increasingly dense network of fast-charging stations and greatly improved charging speeds are alleviating the problem. Charging times will probably continue to decrease. Nevertheless, this point still goes to gasoline and diesel vehicles: 2-2.
5. Keyword: costs
The purchase price for electric vehicles is currently higher than that of classic gas or diesel vehicles. On the other hand, fuel costs are lower, which should pay off over the vehicle's lifespan, especially for frequent drivers. There is not yet sufficient data available to determine how durable electric cars are and what repair costs one can expect over their life cycle. It should be assumed that, over the coming years at least, the niche product will incur higher costs when it comes to repairs, towing or fires.Conclusion: Again, the point goes conventional cars: Score 2-3.
6. Keywords: innovation and coolness
Which car is cooler? Everybody needs to answer this question for himself: However, the Tesla success story proves that electric cars are regarded as innovative, trendy and environmentally aware – and these qualities are also extended to their drivers. Those who want to make their neighbors jealous are more likely to do so with an electric car. So here the points clearly go to electric vehicles.End result: The competition ends in a draw at 3-3. But electric cars will likely come out as winner in as soon as two to three years. Finally, all major manufacturers are launching new electric models, with plenty more in planning.