The motion was accepted: These are the consequences
- Homeowners who live in their property themselves no longer have to declare notional income for theoretically possible rental income (imputed rental value) in their tax return. This applies to primary and secondary residences.
- At the same time, deductions for maintenance or renovation work on the property are no longer possible in the tax return. Energy-saving and environmental protection measures can also no longer be deducted from taxable income for federal tax purposes. Cantons may continue to grant such deductions.
- Mortgage interest for owner-occupied residential property can also no longer be deducted from taxable income. There is an exception for people who are buying residential property for the first time: Married couples can claim a maximum of CHF 10,000 in the first year, CHF 9,000 in the second year and so on, until no more deductions are possible after ten years. For single people it is half of this.
- A property tax for second properties is also to be introduced at cantonal level. This is in the interests of the mountain cantons in particular, which want to secure important tax revenues through this.
Implementation is expected to take place from 2028 so that the cantons have sufficient time to adapt.
As a homeowner, will I benefit from the abolition of the imputed rental value tax?
That depends on the amount of your mortgage, the interest rate, the condition of the property, your municipality of residence and the amount of taxable income.
Any person whose mortgage interest is lower than the imputed rental value is likely to benefit. This means those who have bought cheaply, who have low interest rates or who have already repaid a large part of the mortgage. The abolition of the imputed rental value tax can also bring major tax advantages for pensioners, as it generally accounts for a higher proportion of their taxable income. First-time buyers of owner-occupied residential property are also likely to benefit, as they can claim part of the mortgage interest as an expense in their tax return for the first ten years. If you buy a new build, you need not expect high maintenance costs in the early days.
However, it is also possible that homeowners will pay more tax after the reform than before: Given the current low interest rates, the imputed rental value is higher than mortgage interest for most homeowners – so almost everyone would probably benefit from abolition. However, anyone who owns an older property in need of renovation can no longer offset the costs of the renovation for tax purposes, at least in relation to federal tax, and this may result in tax disadvantages during the year of the renovation.
Regardless of the imputed rental value: What is important for homeowners
Fundamental questions are often forgotten in the discussion about imputed rental value, for example:
- "Will I still be able to afford my own home in the future?"
- "What happens if I have to make do with only a part of my previous salary due to illness?"
- "How do I make sure that my family can stay in familiar surroundings even in the event of death?"
Homeowners should ask themselves such questions regularly – when buying their own home, when having children, when cohabiting or when planning for retirement.
As part of an individual pension analysis, answers to questions about the affordability of a mortgage can be clarified and sensible solutions found:
- Term life insurance offers protection for your family and allows, for example, part of the mortgage to be repaid – so that your loved ones can stay in their own home.
- Disability insurance can close income gaps caused by permanent illness, for example. This ensures the long-term affordability of the mortgage – see table.
- As part of individual pension planning, it is possible to reliably forecast the cash flows that can be expected after retirement. Various scenarios can be developed on this basis. The affordability of the mortgage plays a decisive role here.
Example calculation: Affordability in the event of disability
A simple rule of thumb for the affordability of a home is that housing costs should not exceed around a third of gross income. In the example below, this is no longer the case with a long-term illness of 41%. The situation can be alleviated with a private disability pension. At 34%, affordability is just about given.
Background: Married couple (person 1 employed), 2 children | Situation without protection | Situation with protection | |
Market value | 1.1 million | ||
Mortgage | 600,000 | ||
Imputed interest costs | 27,000 | ||
Ancillary costs | 11,000 |
||
Total costs | 38,000 |
||
Situation before illness | |||
Earnings from gainful employment before illness | 132,000 | 132,000 | |
Affordability | 29% | 29% | |
Disability situation (person 1) | |||
Pension income in the case of illness, 1st and 2nd pillars | 93,000 | 93,000 |
|
Disability pension, 3rd pillar | 18,000 |
||
Total pension benefits | 93,000 |
111,000 |
|
Mortgage affordability | 41% |
34% |
Glossary
- Imputed rental value: Notional income declared in the tax return for owner-occupied residential property.
- Debt interest deduction: Tax deduction for interest paid on mortgages.
- Maintenance costs deduction: Possibility of claiming the costs for the value-preserving maintenance of a property against tax.
- Affordability: Ratio of current housing costs to income; decisive for lending and financial security.
- Property tax: New possible tax on second homes at cantonal level.
- First-time buyer: Persons purchasing residential property for the first time; they would benefit from temporary tax relief if the motion is approved.